That was the evaluation. Today, after eight weeks of therapy, was the reevaluation. I've made tremendous progress and both I and the therapist are pleased. But that is not to say that there is not still some difficulty in everything I do with the operated arm. Three actions on the list are definite "don't even think about doing this" activities, like scratch your back, lift a ten pound weight, or remove your wallet from your back pocket. Not that I carry my wallet in a back pocket, this is obviously a unisex exam. Today I scored 40, a huge improvement. Good for me.
The good reason for the test is to objectively measure one's progress. The real reason for the test is to decide if insurance, Medicare in my case, will pay for continuing therapy. In some perverse* corporate/government rationalization, if you are not showing improvement, not getting better, if your score is not going down, Medicare will not continue to pay for therapy. Wouldn't it seem like the person who has not improved needs continuing therapy more than someone like me who is well on the road to recovery? Therapy for the unimproved patient now falls into the category of "maintenance" and is not covered.
My test results and the therapist's notes will now go to my surgeon. He will look them over and, most likely, recommend more therapy sessions. And Medicare will, most likely, cover the cost. It just seems backwards to me.
perverse" - contrary to the accepted or expected standard or practice."in two general elections the outcome was quite perverse"
synonyms: illogical, irrational, unreasonable, wrong, wrong-headed
"a verdict that is manifestly perverse"
No comments:
Post a Comment